AI Tool Stacks
Real-world tech stacks for building AI applications. Each includes build times, costs, examples, and trade-offs to help you choose.
From "ship in hours" to "enterprise-grade" - pick the stack that matches your timeline and requirements.
Architecture
Best For
- AI chatbots with streaming responses
- Customer support AI
- Internal tools with conversational UI
- Rapid prototyping
What You Can Build
Full-featured chat with streaming, message history, and conversation management
Embed PDFs with pgvector, query with semantic search, stream contextual responses
Generate forms from descriptions, validate inputs with AI, export code
✓ Pros
- • Fastest time to production
- • Excellent DX with useChat/useCompletion hooks
- • Free tier on Vercel
- • Active community and templates
- • Type-safe with TypeScript
⚠ Cons
- • Locked into Vercel ecosystem (less flexibility)
- • Limited for complex multi-agent systems
- • Less control over streaming internals
Architecture
Best For
- Multi-step agent workflows
- Document analysis and RAG systems
- Agent teams and orchestration
- Research and experimentation
What You Can Build
Agent that searches web, reads PDFs, synthesizes findings with citations
Natural language to SQL, execute queries, generate visualizations
Coordinator agent that delegates to specialist agents (research, writing, coding)
✓ Pros
- • Most comprehensive agent framework
- • Excellent documentation and community
- • LangSmith for production debugging
- • Supports all major LLM providers
- • Pre-built chains and agents
⚠ Cons
- • Steeper learning curve
- • Heavy abstraction can obscure behavior
- • Python-first (JS version less mature)
- • Can be overkill for simple use cases
Architecture
Best For
- Enterprise agent deployments
- Security-sensitive applications
- Tool-heavy agent workflows
- Long-context analysis (1M tokens)
What You Can Build
MCP server for git, files, and terminal. Claude reviews PRs and suggests fixes
MCP servers for Postgres, S3, and Slack. Agent monitors data quality and alerts
✓ Pros
- • Standardized protocol (not vendor-locked)
- • Security by design with server isolation
- • 1M context window for massive documents
- • Prompt caching (90% cost reduction)
- • Great for enterprise compliance
⚠ Cons
- • Newer ecosystem (fewer examples)
- • Requires understanding MCP protocol
- • Claude-specific (not multi-model yet)
- • Desktop-first approach (web support coming)
Architecture
Best For
- Customer service bots with memory
- Persistent agent conversations
- Code interpreters and file analysis
- Teams wanting managed infrastructure
What You Can Build
Multi-turn conversations with memory, knowledge base search, ticket creation
Upload CSVs, analyze with Code Interpreter, generate charts and insights
✓ Pros
- • No backend infrastructure needed
- • Built-in conversation threading
- • Code Interpreter for data analysis
- • Automatic memory management
- • Simple API, fast development
⚠ Cons
- • Vendor lock-in to OpenAI
- • Less control over internals
- • Can get expensive at scale
- • Limited customization of orchestration
Architecture
Best For
- Privacy-sensitive applications
- Offline AI capabilities
- Experimentation without API costs
- Learning model internals
What You Can Build
ChatGPT-like interface running entirely locally with Llama 4
Embed sensitive docs locally, query with RAG, zero data leaves your machine
✓ Pros
- • Complete privacy and data control
- • No API costs (free inference)
- • Works offline
- • Full model customization possible
- • Great for learning
⚠ Cons
- • Requires powerful GPU (16GB+ VRAM)
- • Slower inference than cloud
- • Local models lag SOTA by 6-12 months
- • More setup and maintenance
Architecture
Best For
- Non-technical founders testing ideas
- Rapid prototyping and demos
- Learning by seeing generated code
- Internal tools and MVPs
What You Can Build
Describe features, AI generates responsive landing with forms and analytics
AI generates full-stack app with auth, database, and admin panel
Connect to APIs, AI builds data viz dashboard with filters and exports
✓ Pros
- • Fastest possible time to working app
- • No coding required
- • Learn by seeing generated code
- • Iterate with natural language
- • One-click deployment
⚠ Cons
- • Limited customization
- • Generated code can be messy
- • Vendor lock-in
- • Not suitable for complex applications
- • Subscription cost adds up